By Daniel Gilling
This paintings summarizes and synthesizes the colossal crime prevention literature to supply an approachable and complete textual content for college students. It units out a serious research within the context of the politics of legal justice coverage.
Read or Download Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy, and Politics PDF
Similar public policy books
Info how legislators can go back the federal goverment to the dimensions and scope anticipated by way of the Founding Fathers.
This well timed booklet examines the monstrous surges in immigration because the mid-1990s in Australia and the U.S., of the world's most crucial settler-receiving nations. Australia's shift to a points-based, skills-oriented procedure is contrasted with the political impasse that has avoided any uncomplicated swap in US immigration coverage in this interval.
Governments and overseas enterprises more and more use public-private partnerships to convey crucial public items. This book presents a brand new version of responsibility which guarantees that those partnerships do not erode public responsibility. It defines concrete responsibility criteria for various forms of partnerships.
- Campus Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know®
- Sudan: Darfur and the Failure of an African State
- The Handbook on the Political Economy of War
- Ireland, Slavery and Anti-Slavery: 1612-1865
- Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union (The European Union Series)
Extra resources for Crime Prevention: Theory, Policy, and Politics
In essence, planning orthodoxy had been responsible for making cities unsafe places, where vandals, robbers and other street criminals could ply their unnatural trades without fear of apprehension. The city, however, was not beyond salvation, for contemporary planning orthodoxy had not penetrated everywhere, and vestiges of hope remained in a number of models of urban safety from some older city quarters, from which valuable lessons could be learned, “to strengthen whatever workable forces for maintaining safety and civilisation do exist—in the cities we do have” (1965:41).
This diversity would, of itself, constrain the opportunities for crime on the streets, the focus of her criminological attention. In particular, diversity of use would bring more “eyes onto the street” by encouraging more widespread and continuous use of the streets and parks as places of leisure, play and commerce, and by clearly demarcating public and private space. This could be reinforced, moreover, by designing buildings in order to maximize their surveillance potential, which was far preferable to attempting to ensure safety by building physical barriers that encouraged a socially divisive “fortress mentality” and an aggressive “turf” attitude, not so dissimilar to that held by delinquent gangs.
Thus it could be dismissed as mere anecdote or polemic. In a male-dominated field such as criminology, moreover, it could not have helped that she was a woman, oversimplifying a problem that apparently greater male minds had struggled with for decades. Indeed, Jacobs herself was mindful of her recommendations being taken as any kind of panacea, pointing out that, ultimately, “deep and complicated social ills must lie behind delinquency and crime” (1965:41), and thereby paying reverence to the orthodoxies of the day.