By Anikó Lipták
This quantity brings jointly contemporary paintings in generative syntax on correlative relative constructions. vastly increasing at the Hindi-oriented scope of past reports, it describes and analyzes correlative buildings in a variety of languages, reminiscent of Basque, Dutch, Hungarian, Polish, Sanskrit, Serbo-Croatian and Tibetan, compared to correlativization in Hindi. The articles zoom in on 3 parts of curiosity: to begin with, the similarities and adjustments among correlatives and different wh- and relative buildings; secondly, the derivation of correlative structures and the location correlative clauses occupy within the host clause and thirdly, the matching results that symbolize the pairings among relative words and demonstrative words. The stories awarded right here will attract researchers and scholars with an curiosity in syntax usually and relativization concepts particularly.
Read or Download Correlatives Cross-Linguistically (Language Faculty and Beyond) PDF
Similar grammar books
This booklet provides an leading edge concept of syntactic different types and the lexical periods they outline. It revives the normal concept that those are to be extraordinary notionally (semantically). It permits there to be peripheral individuals of a lexical type which could now not evidently comply with the overall definition.
This learn presents the 1st description-oriented, theoretically-unaligned account of wh-clauses in smooth English. the writer employs a data-based method of research features of either generative and non-generative paintings as regards their relative strengths and weaknesses. Wh-clauses in English: facets of concept and outline is a distinct mixture of statistical findings and qualitative research.
The essays accumulated during this quantity, such a lot formerly unpublished, handle a couple of heavily interconnected concerns raised by means of the comparative syntax of sensible heads in the Principles-and-Parameters strategy. the overall thought of head flow, the houses of derived buildings created by way of incorporation, and the parameterization concerned are the most theoretical foci.
Delivering a unified answer in the frameworks of building Grammar and body Semantics, Hans Boas develops an account of resultative buildings in English by way of grouping them in sessions: conventionalized and non-conventionalized. The usage-based version used the following proposes that every specific experience of a verb constitutes a conventionalized mini-construction, that is an important info for the licensing of arguments.
- Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics)
- Embedded V-To-C in Child Grammar: The Acquisition of Verb Placement in Swiss German (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics)
- Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, Vol. 216)
- Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax (Studies in English Language)
- Thoughts on grammaticalization (Classics in Linguistics) (Volume 1)
Additional resources for Correlatives Cross-Linguistically (Language Faculty and Beyond)
The syntactic difference of course is that correlatives contain a wh-item, which this analysis treats not as a relativizer, but as an extreme non-specific item (in the sense of Farkas 2002), similar in meaning to free The landscape of correlatives choice ‘any’ phrases. The fact that it can occur together with a conditional marker supports the analysis of correlatives as conditionals: (70) Ko na brdo ak’ i malo stoji, više vidi od onog pod brdo. ’ The wh-non-specific expression appears at the beginning of the clause due to its topic function.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 175–223. Grosu, Alexander. 2000. Type resolution in relative constructions. Feature marking and dependency encoding. In Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder (eds), The syntax of relative clauses. 83–120.
A slightly different formulation is found in Bittner (2001), who is concerned with the logical representation of individuals and possibilities, from the point of view of centering theory. She shows that conditional clauses center a possibility, Anikó Lipták while correlatives center an individual. 20 Based on the observation that Serbian correlatives and conditionals show parallel syntactic and semantic behavior, this work treats correlatives as a subtype of conditional clauses, a type that involves extreme non-specific wh-expressions in topic positions in the CP-domain.