Collective Epistemology by Hans Bernhard Schmid

By Hans Bernhard Schmid

“We carry those truths to be self-evident, that every one males are created equal….” This number of essays addresses a philosophical challenge raised via the 1st clause of those recognized phrases. Does each one signatory of the statement of Independence carry those truths individually, do they share some type of a common attitude, or is there a single subject over and above the heads of its person participants that possesses a trust? Collective epistemology is a reputation for the view that cognitive attitudes may be attributed to teams in a non-summative feel. the purpose of this quantity is to check this declare, and to put it within the wider context of contemporary epistemological debates concerning the position of sociality in wisdom acquisition.

Show description

Read Online or Download Collective Epistemology PDF

Similar epistemology books

Realism and Truth

During this provocative and wide-ranging booklet, Michael Devitt argues for a thoroughgoing realism concerning the commonsense and medical actual global, and for a correspondence idea of fact. additionally, he argues that, opposite to got opinion, the metaphysical query of realism is exact from, and sooner than, any semantic query approximately fact.

Lazare and Sadi Carnot: A Scientific and Filial Relationship

Lazare Carnot was once the original instance within the historical past of technology of somebody who inadvertently owed the medical reputation he finally completed to prior political prominence. He and his son Sadi produced paintings that derived from their education as engineering and went principally ignored by means of physicists for a new release or extra, even supposing their respective paintings brought options that proved basic whilst taken up later by way of different palms.

Additional info for Collective Epistemology

Sample text

Time Lag Suppose we limit ourselves only to cases where neither the group nor the individuals could be open to the charge of epistemic irrationality. If both the group as a whole and the individual members are not open to epistemic criticism, can the outcome of the group epistemic process differ from the views of the individual members? I believe that they can—consider the following case: Case D: The hiring committee adopts a different procedure for combining their individual judgments. 25 The members are so confident in their group procedures that they reasonably believe that their collective judgments are likely to be more reliable than their individual judgments.

Morally virtuous persons not only judge and feel appropriately but move easily to act in morally appropriate ways; for such persons doing the right thing constitutes a 'default mode'" (Wood 1998, 45f). , 33-53). 47 of properties, while they can be blamed only for the absence of "character virtues" but not for the absence of "faculty virtues" (or faculties). This distinction is based on the assumption "that character traits are those dispositions over which we can exercise certain types of control" (Lahroodi 2007, 284).

K. Matilal and A. ), Knowing from Words. Boston: Kluwer, 125–161. ——— (1995), “Critical Notice: Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony”. Mind 104, 393–411. Fricker, M. (2007), Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lackey, J. (2006), “The Nature of Testimony”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 8, issue 2, 177-197. McMyler, B. (2007), “Knowledge at Second Hand”. Inquiry 50, 5, 511-540. Moran, R. (2006), “Getting Told and Being Believed”.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.15 of 5 – based on 37 votes