By Phoevos Panagiotidis
Offering a unique thought of components of speech, this publication discusses categorization from a methodological and theoretical element a view. It attracts on discoveries and insights from a couple of techniques - typology, cognitive grammar, notional methods, and generative grammar - and provides a generative, feature-based idea. development on up to date examine and the most recent findings and ideas in categorization and word-building, Panagiotidis combines the primacy of express positive factors with a syntactic categorization method, addressing the elemental, yet usually missed, questions in grammatical conception. Designed for graduate scholars and researchers learning grammar and syntax, this publication is richly illustrated with examples from various languages and explains components and phenomena imperative to the character of human language.
Read Online or Download Categorial Features: A Generative Theory of Word Class Categories PDF
Similar grammar books
This booklet provides an leading edge conception of syntactic different types and the lexical sessions they outline. It revives the conventional concept that those are to be extraordinary notionally (semantically). It makes it possible for there to be peripheral participants of a lexical category that can no longer evidently agree to the final definition.
This research offers the 1st description-oriented, theoretically-unaligned account of wh-clauses in sleek English. the writer employs a data-based method of study elements of either generative and non-generative paintings as regards their relative strengths and weaknesses. Wh-clauses in English: facets of thought and outline is a distinct blend of statistical findings and qualitative research.
The essays amassed during this quantity, such a lot formerly unpublished, handle a few heavily interconnected matters raised by way of the comparative syntax of sensible heads in the Principles-and-Parameters method. the overall idea of head flow, the houses of derived constructions created by means of incorporation, and the parameterization concerned are the most theoretical foci.
Offering a unified resolution in the frameworks of building Grammar and body Semantics, Hans Boas develops an account of resultative buildings in English by way of grouping them in periods: conventionalized and non-conventionalized. The usage-based version used right here proposes that every specific experience of a verb constitutes a conventionalized mini-construction, that's the most important details for the licensing of arguments.
- The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives
- Fuzzy Grammar: A Reader
- How to write correct English
- The Routledge Intermediate Dutch Reader (Routledge Modern Language Readers)
Extra resources for Categorial Features: A Generative Theory of Word Class Categories
Here are some examples from Baker (2003, 90–1): (21) Jingulu verbs a. ’ b. ’ c. ’ baka-ngayi arduku d. ’ Pensalﬁni (1997) argues that ‘come’, ‘go’ and ‘do/be’ are light verbs. I understand that ‘light verbs’ in this instance can possibly be equated to semi-lexical verbs (see Chapter 4). 14 This receives support by the differences in transitivity between examples c. and d. in (21), induced by the choice of ‘go’ versus ‘do’, the latter inducing transitivity. Baker (2003, 91–4), on the contrary, takes ‘come’, ‘go’ and ‘do/be’ to be inﬂected auxiliary verbs (like have and be in English) with roots like ngaruk (‘dive’) in (21) to be the actual verbs themselves.
Thus, depending on the NV element, the same LV may occur in different types of event structure. (Folli, Harley, and Karimi 2003, 100) Appealing to the Farsi case is valuable, because there is consensus that its complex predicates are made of light verbs and a non-verbal element. Nevertheless, both elements contribute to the properties of the overall complex predicate. In other words, although Jingulu roots affect the type of the complex predicate’s thematic grid, this is no evidence that these roots are verbal.
25 possibly moot in a syntactic categorization approach. 7. 9 does the same for adpositions. The ﬁnal section concludes the chapter. 2 Do all languages have nouns and verbs? How can we tell? We set out in the previous chapter to develop a UG theory of grammatical category. This entails making claims about the Language Faculty. , all languages have a word for ‘mother’ or ‘sun’ for obvious reasons) or, worse, (b) a methodological bias that seeks to impose Indo-European categories on languages working in distinctly non-Indo-European ways.