By Anna Maria Di Sciullo
During this groundbreaking monograph, Anna Maria Di Sciullo proposes that asymmetry—the irreversibility of a couple of parts in an ordered set—is a hard-wired estate of morphological relatives. Her argument that asymmetry is important in derivational morphology, might, if real, make morphological items commonplace gadgets of grammar simply as syntactic and phonological items are. This contrasts with the normal assumption that morphology is abnormal and therefore now not topic to the elemental hard-wired regularities of shape and interpretation.
Di Sciullo argues that the uneven estate of morphological relatives is a part of the language college. She proposes a conception of grammar, Asymmetry thought, in accordance with which typical operations have particular instantiations in parallel derivations of the computational area. She posits that morphological and syntactic kin proportion a estate, asymmetry, yet diverge with admire to different homes in their primitives, operations, and interface representations. Di Sciullo deals empirical aid for her concept with examples from quite a few languages, together with English, glossy Greek, African, Romance, Turkish, and Slavic.
Read Online or Download Asymmetry in Morphology PDF
Best grammar books
This booklet provides an cutting edge conception of syntactic different types and the lexical periods they outline. It revives the normal concept that those are to be distinct notionally (semantically). It permits there to be peripheral participants of a lexical type that may now not evidently comply with the final definition.
This examine offers the 1st description-oriented, theoretically-unaligned account of wh-clauses in sleek English. the writer employs a data-based method of study elements of either generative and non-generative paintings as regards their relative strengths and weaknesses. Wh-clauses in English: points of thought and outline is a distinct blend of statistical findings and qualitative research.
The essays gathered during this quantity, so much formerly unpublished, handle a couple of heavily interconnected concerns raised by way of the comparative syntax of sensible heads in the Principles-and-Parameters strategy. the final conception of head move, the homes of derived buildings created by means of incorporation, and the parameterization concerned are the most theoretical foci.
Offering a unified resolution in the frameworks of building Grammar and body Semantics, Hans Boas develops an account of resultative buildings in English through grouping them in sessions: conventionalized and non-conventionalized. The usage-based version used right here proposes that every specific experience of a verb constitutes a conventionalized mini-construction, that is an important details for the licensing of arguments.
- Non-Canonical Passives (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today)
- Number – Constructions and Semantics: Case studies from Africa, Amazonia, India and Oceania (Studies in Language Companion Series)
- Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics)
- The Generative Lexicon
- Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today)
- Grammar Schools of Medieval England: A F. Leach in Historiographical Perspective by John N. Miner (1990-01-01)
Extra info for Asymmetry in Morphology
However, there are two cases where reordering is possible: (1) diminutive clusters in Italian and (2) causative-reﬂexive a‰xation in Ecuadorian Quechua, reported in Muysken 1981. As predicted, di¤erent orderings of the a‰xes yield systematic di¤erences in interpretation. (37) dim1 * dim2; dim2 * dim1 -ino: descriptive; -etto: evaluative a. tavolo, tavolino, tavoletto (It) ‘table’, ‘small table’, ‘funny small table’ b. tavolinetto, tavolettino ‘small funny table’, ‘funny small table’ (38) CAUSE * REC; REC * CAUSE a.
2 This hypothesis is compatible with the Derivation by Phase Model (Chomsky 2001; Uriagereka 1999). Asymmetry Theory extends the Derivation by Phase model into a fully parallel model. The representation in (1) illustrates, with great 22 Chapter 2 oversimpliﬁcation, the components, M, S, F, S, the parallel DM =DS , derivations, and the resulting domains of computation, domain1 . . domainn , which are interpreted at LF and PF. (1) F Lex(LA) M domain1 S S ... D DM /DS domain1 domainn LF DM /DS D ...
Flip applies before the PF precedence relations have been established, and so it does not modify the precedence relations. Moreover, Flip does not alter the dominance relations. Flip contributes to linearization in the derivation of morphological and syntactic objects that linearize under di¤erent conditions. When applying to the outcome of DS , Flip derives the order of ‘‘heavy’’ modiﬁers generated in the speciﬁer of a functional projection, thus to the left of a functional head by creating a mirror image of Asymmetry Theory 31 the tree headed by that functional head at PF.