By John M. Anderson
This publication provides an cutting edge conception of syntactic different types and the lexical sessions they outline. It revives the conventional concept that those are to be exclusive notionally (semantically). It permits there to be peripheral participants of a lexical classification that can now not evidently comply with the final definition. the writer proposes a notation according to semantic positive aspects which bills for the syntactic behaviour of periods. The e-book additionally provides a case for contemplating this class - back in fairly conventional vein - to be easy to choosing the syntactic constitution of sentences. Syntactic constitution is therefore erected in a really constrained style, with out recourse to circulation or empty parts.
Read or Download A notional theory of syntactic categories PDF
Best grammar books
This ebook provides an leading edge thought of syntactic different types and the lexical sessions they outline. It revives the normal concept that those are to be distinct notionally (semantically). It enables there to be peripheral participants of a lexical type that may no longer evidently comply with the overall definition.
This learn offers the 1st description-oriented, theoretically-unaligned account of wh-clauses in glossy English. the writer employs a data-based method of research points of either generative and non-generative paintings as regards their relative strengths and weaknesses. Wh-clauses in English: points of thought and outline is a distinct blend of statistical findings and qualitative research.
The essays accrued during this quantity, so much formerly unpublished, deal with a few heavily interconnected matters raised by way of the comparative syntax of practical heads in the Principles-and-Parameters process. the final concept of head stream, the houses of derived buildings created by way of incorporation, and the parameterization concerned are the most theoretical foci.
Offering a unified resolution in the frameworks of building Grammar and body Semantics, Hans Boas develops an account of resultative structures in English through grouping them in periods: conventionalized and non-conventionalized. The usage-based version used right here proposes that every specific experience of a verb constitutes a conventionalized mini-construction, that's the most important details for the licensing of arguments.
- A Gateway To Sindarin: A Grammar of an Elvish Language from J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings
- Patterns and Development in the English Clause System: A Corpus-Based Grammatical Overview
- Round-Up 6 Student Book 3rd. Edition (Round Up Grammar Practice)
- Grammatica tedesca con esercizi, 3rd Edition
- An Introduction to the Grammar of English: Syntactic arguments and socio-historical background
Additional resources for A notional theory of syntactic categories
23) a. The weather has changed b. Leon has changed his socks 30 Fundamentals of a notional theory with either one ('neutral') complement or two ('neutral' and 'agentive'). Recurrent multiple complementational patterns may be captured by lexical redundancies. The (provisional) elements 'agentive' and 'neutral' thus label secondary categories; as observed in chapter i, the distribution of a secondary category is included in that of the category with which it is associated, and it is again identified by notional features.
E. 5) a. Fred is a doctor b. Alphonse est medecin c. O Petros ine 8iki7oros 'A. is a doctor' 'P. 6) a. The man with the shakes is Fred b. 6) is not 'Fred-ness' or 'doctorness' of 'the man with the shakes'; rather, what is predicated is (referential) identity between two arguments, 'the man with the shakes' and 'Fred'/'the doctor'. 7) a. Fred is the man with the shakes b. The doctor is the man with the shakes only in assignment of unmarked discourse function. 5b and c), in many languages, such as French and Greek, it may be that no article accompanies a predicative noun, or some predicative nouns, even if, as in French, a noun is otherwise normally accompanied by a determiner.
14c), as 'intransitive'), though lacking the P feature, also display subcategorisation (Roger Bohm, personal communication). But we should also observe that determiners and pronouns (and 'transitive' and 'intransitive' functors) are distinguished by presence vs. absence of a complement rather than in terms of the character of the complement(s), as in the functor selection of 'relational' nouns. We can then distinguish between weak subcategorisation, manifested by determiners, which is simply a consequence of 22 Fundamentals of a notional theory complement structure and the fact that not all complements can be obligatory (with respect to a particular category), and strong subcategorisption of the differential character displayed by categories containing P.