By Luis López
During this quantity, Luis L?pez sheds new mild on info constitution and makes an important contribution to paintings on grammatical operations within the Minimalist application. via a cautious research of dislocations and concentration fronting in Romance, the writer indicates that notions equivalent to 'topic' and 'focus', as frequently outlined, yield no predictions and proposes in its place a characteristic method in keeping with the notions 'discourse anaphor' and 'contrast'. He offers a close version of syntax---information-structure interplay and argues that this interplay happens on the part point, with a privileged position for the sting of the section. additional, he investigates phenomena about the syntax of items in Romance and Germanic - accusative A, p-movement, clitic doubling, scrambling, item shift - and exhibits that there are cross-linguistic correlations among syntactic configuration and specificity, autonomous of discourse connectedness. the amount ends with a longer research of the syntax of dislocations in Romance.
Read or Download A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure (Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) PDF
Similar grammar books
This booklet provides an cutting edge conception of syntactic different types and the lexical periods they outline. It revives the normal concept that those are to be unique notionally (semantically). It enables there to be peripheral individuals of a lexical category that can now not evidently comply with the overall definition.
This research presents the 1st description-oriented, theoretically-unaligned account of wh-clauses in smooth English. the writer employs a data-based method of learn features of either generative and non-generative paintings as regards their relative strengths and weaknesses. Wh-clauses in English: points of concept and outline is a different mix of statistical findings and qualitative research.
The essays accrued during this quantity, such a lot formerly unpublished, handle a few heavily interconnected concerns raised via the comparative syntax of sensible heads in the Principles-and-Parameters method. the final concept of head flow, the homes of derived constructions created by way of incorporation, and the parameterization concerned are the most theoretical foci.
Offering a unified answer in the frameworks of development Grammar and body Semantics, Hans Boas develops an account of resultative structures in English through grouping them in sessions: conventionalized and non-conventionalized. The usage-based version used right here proposes that every specific experience of a verb constitutes a conventionalized mini-construction, that's an important info for the licensing of arguments.
- Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Symantic Perspectives (Oxford Linguistics)
- The Advanced Grammar Book, Second Edition
- Grammar of the Kabardian Language
- Les Verbes Anglais: 6000 verbes et leurs composés, Édition 97
- The Architecture of Determiners (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax)
- Round-Up 1 Teachers Book 3rd Edition (Round Up Grammar Practice)
Extra resources for A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure (Studies in Theoretical Linguistics)
As we have seen, a constituent marked as [+Focus] may stay in situ or it may move—but whatever makes it move is not the focus feature, since focus can contentedly stay in situ. I suggest that movement to left periphery position, either by FF or wh-phrases, is connected with [+c]. 34) Context: Did you buy furniture? Doncs, de cadires no en vaig comprar . . ’ [It] This moved quantiWer is arguably also [+c]. A sentence like (i) is most naturally uttered in the context in which someone asserts that we will Wnd no one.
G. one can have two CLLDed constituents but not two FFed ones) should be understood as restrictions imposed by the interpretive interfaces and not derived by X’-theory assumptions. Finally, I show that Rizzi’s framework provides no insight into relatively ‘‘impoverished’’ left peripheries like that of Finnish. Chapter 4 provides empirical substance to the analyses presented in Chapter 3. In particular, I argue that a detailed analysis of sub-extraction phenomena yields the consequence that the pragmatic features [+a] and [+c] are indeed assigned at the end of each phase.
45) Context: So, what do we do with the chairs? ’’ Information structure 43 Generic CLRDed must remain on the back burner until Chapter 4. There, I provide a solution dependent on a derivational view of the syntax– information structure interface. 43a) the anaphoric relation is established before the dislocated constituent is bound by a generic operator. The relationship between CLLD and its antecedent is more complex and falls into one of the following categories: subset, superset, set-membership, and part/whole (Villalba 2000).